Ottmar Edenhofer, Christian Flachsland, Lisa Katharina Schmid

Decarbonization and EU ETS Reform

Introducing a price floor to drive lowcarbon investments

26 Seiten · 6,21 EUR
(15. April 2019)

Ich bin mit den AGB, insbesondere Punkt 10 (ausschließlich private Nutzung, keine Weitergabe an Dritte), einverstanden und erkenne an, dass meine Bestellung nicht widerrufen werden kann.

Introduction:

In this anthology, the editors want to review the first 12 years of European emissions trading, clarify its significance today and finally look ahead. To this end, they addressed renowned experts from science, business, politics, associations and organizations and asked for their views on the European emissions trading system (EU ETS). In this book there are articles with a retrospective focus, some of which are very personal but extremely colourful, depicting the exciting phase of the beginning from the direct perspective of the players involved. The articles in the book show broad agreement in the analysis and description of the deficits of the EU ETS. When it comes to the question of suitable solutions, however, the picture is more heterogeneous and quite controversial. At its core, the debate here centers on the need for minimum prices and/or more ambitious quantity control. The demand for the introduction of a minimum price in various forms, in terms of scope and format, therefore occupies some space in the book (see in particular Ottmar Edenhofer, Christian Flachsland, Lisa Katharina Schmid (MCC)).

With all its contributions, the book provides a comprehensive overview of the establishment, impact and further development of the European Emissions Trading System from the various perspectives of those involved. Many articles take up the negotiations on the reform of the EU ETS for the fourth trading period and the emerging results. The authors have well anticipated the main features of this decision, which is now available. In addition, individual contributions have been updated after 22 November 2017. The book has thus escaped a possible “topicality trap”, which reassures the editors very much.